WebDukhmochan Pandey & Ors. -Appellants versus State of Bihar -Respondent Criminal Appeal No. 197 of 1982 With Criminal Appeal No. 198 of 1982 Decided on 25-9-1997 … WebState of Bihar, the Supreme Court, held that: “Common intention which developed at the spur of the moment is different from the similar intention actuated a number of person at …
Dukhmochan Pandey & Ors., Shamsul ... vs State Of Bihar …
WebIn the case of Dukhmochan Pandey v. State of Bihar, the Supreme Court, held that: “Common intention which developed at the spur of the moment is different from the similar intention actuated a number of person at the same time....the distinction between a common intention and similar intention may be fine, but is nonetheless a real one and if ... WebIn the case of Dukhmochan Pandey v. State of Bihar (1997) 8 SCC 405 , 1998 SCC (Cri) 93 this Court has held that there lies a distinction between the common intention and similar intention and the question whether there exists a common intention in all the persons who did some overt act resulting in the death of some of the persons of the other ... carenage suzuki 50 lt
5 Whether It Is To Be Circulated To ... vs State Of ... on 13 February ...
WebConsidering the aforesaid facts it was held that the appellants did not share any common object to commit murder of any one. Even in the case of Dukhmochan Pandey v. State … WebDukhmochan Pandey v. State of Bihar, the Supreme Court, held that: “Common intention which developed at the spur of the moment is different from the similar intention actuated a number of person at the same time....the distinction between a common intention and similar intention may be fine, but WebIn the case of Dukhmochan Pandey v. State of Bihar, the Supreme Court, held that: “Common intention which developed at the spur of the moment is different from the … carénage suzuki gladius